$63,000
and $66,000 are respectively vast sums of money to the average
consumer. 425 and 707 horsepower are equally staggering performance
figures in a world where 200 horsepower is the norm for most passenger
cars. Yet, both numbers come from what you could call “family-oriented
automobiles”. Capable of taking the kids to school, running errands, or
demolishing tires at an empty intersection.
The BMW M3 and the Dodge Charger Hellcat
don’t compete for the same market share. They don’t even compete in the
same levels of performance. One is a German surgeon’s scalpel, while
the other an American chainsaw. However, where they do compete is in
pricing, and gauging their individual prices versus what each offer, how
does one choose between the two performance sedans.
M vs. SRT
Since their debut, we’ve driven both cars extensively. Last year, we named the Dodge Charger Hellcat our BoldRide of the Year.
We love its instantaneous tire destruction and its ability to make
everyone in the world once again feel like a child. The BMW M3, on the
other hand, is one of the best performance cars around. Period. The
handling, power delivery from its turbocharged inline six-cylinder
engine, and the fact that you can still get it with a manual
transmission has us swooning.
It
was a real struggle when both the Charger Hellcat and the M3 had to
leave our care, since they are both the kind of performance sedans we’d
rather not give back. But we definitely had more trouble giving back one
over the other—and it might not be the one you’re all expecting
The
Dodge Charger Hellcat is a beautiful machine and offers a performance
that you typically wouldn’t be able to touch unless dropping
six-figures. It’s the everyman’s supercar, and that’s what Dodge
intended it to be. But it doesn’t have the well-rounded nature that
BMW’s M3 offers. The Charger Hellcat is great at making loud noises,
sitting five people comfortably, and demolishing some purpose-built
racing cars. Though it will allow you to drift a corner like you’re Ken
Block, it doesn’t exactly handle all that well. The BMW is another
story.
Thrashing
BMW’s M3 was definitely a highlight of the year. Taking it into the
canyons, and pushing it to our limits revealed a car that’s
frighteningly faster than we are. It’s manual transmission is sublime as
you shift through its gears. The traction delivered from the suspension
setup, the chassis, and its Michelin Pilot Super Sports is phenomenal.
Nevertheless, it still has enough slack in that geometry, and enough
torque to light up the rear end and fill the area with a dense cloud of
tire smoke. It’s a hooligan in BMW clothing.
Add the level of sophistication in the BMW, and the two cars become light-years apart. Whereas the Charger Hellcat was built to be a cheaper, super-sedan alternative, BMW didn’t skimp on the details; every piece of trim, the quality of the leather on the seats, and every knob and button feels Teutonic. A vast contrast to the Charger Hellcat’s interior made of hard plastics. The BMW’s engine however, is the star of the show.
Is Horsepower The Defining Factor?
BMW’s
last M3 made use of naturally aspirated V8 engine, and had a bellow
that needed to be witnessed in person to truly appreciate. But the M3’s
new twin-turbocharged inline six-cylinder engine is a symphony, a
masterful triumph in turbocharged engines. There’s virtually no lag from
the turbo setup, meaning you have almost instantaneous acceleration.
It’s a violence that you wish to repeat over and over again. Where the
Charger Hellcat’s acceleration could be described as a sledgehammer, the
M3 is a laser-guided missile.
That
ferocity is down to the 1,000-pound weight difference between the two
cars. The Charger Hellcat, while having 707 horsepower, weighs a hefty
4,575 pounds. The M3, with its 425 horsepower, weighs just 3,540 lbs.
That weight makes a deafening difference between the two performance
sedans, one that can’t be made up with horsepower alone.
Of
course, armchair enthusiasts that have never driven either car will
call us idiots, or noobs, or the kind of slanderous expletives
frequently found on forums and in comment sections for picking the BMW
M3 over the obviously better because it has more horsepower Dodge
Charger Hellcat. We still love the Charger Hellcat, and that you could
spec one out with a baby seat.
The BMW M3 is just that good, and in the real world, 425 horsepower is better than 707.
Specs
BMW M3
Engine: 3.0-liter Twin-turbocharged Inline Six-Cylinder
Horsepower: 425
0-60: 3.8 Seconds
Price: $63,200
Horsepower: 425
0-60: 3.8 Seconds
Price: $63,200
Dodge Charger Hellcat
Engine: 6.2-liter Supercharged V8
Horsepower: 707
0-60: 3.7 Seconds
Price: $65,945
Horsepower: 707
0-60: 3.7 Seconds
Price: $65,945
Positives
BMW quality is unmatched in the class
Turbo and supercharger noises are great things to have
Both have ludicrous top speeds
Turbo and supercharger noises are great things to have
Both have ludicrous top speeds
Negatives
Pricey options on BMW M3
Hellcat has too much hard plastic
We don’t own either of them…
Hellcat has too much hard plastic
We don’t own either of them…
Photo Credit: Jeff Perez and Jonathon Klein for BoldRide
Source : yahooautos
Source : yahooautos
0 comments:
Post a Comment
What's On Your Mind?